Skip Navigation



Journal of the American Academy of Religion Advance Access published online on May 23, 2007

Journal of the American Academy of Religion, doi:10.1093/jaarel/lfm002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
75/2/353    most recent
lfm002v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press, on behalf of the American Academy of Religion. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The Economics of Salvation: Toward a Theory of Exchange in Chinese Buddhism

Michael J. Walsh

Vassar College, Box 322, 124 Raymond Avenue, Poughkeepsie, New York 12604, USA

E-mail: miwalsh{at}vassar.edu


   Abstract

This essay theorizes the material implications of Chinese Buddhist merit as a transaction exchange mechanism. Over the last two and a half millennia, merit has necessitated an institutionalized paradigm: from the position of both the donor and recipient, you must expend that which you have (land, harvest, money, labor, and time) in order to gain that which you feel you need (a more lucrative lifestyle, a more desirable existence, social recognition, and salvation after death). To gain one must give; or more accurately, to receive one must first bestow. Without this exchange process, it is unlikely that Buddhism would have survived. This exchange formed the foundation of the Buddhist monastic economy in China. I further lay out some key terms for studying the history of Buddhist merit as a transaction of religious exchange and offer them as potentially useful categories of exploration in other fields. Although I take Song dynasty (960–1276 CE) Chinese Buddhist monastic culture as my point of departure, the discussion extends its focus toward the broader impact of merit exchange arguing that the exchange of goods for merit was (and is) the defining social mechanism of Chinese Buddhism.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.