Skip Navigation

Journal of the American Academy of Religion 1979 XLVII(4):589-607; doi:10.1093/jaarel/XLVII.4.589
© 1979 by American Academy of Religion
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stern, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Articles

Al-Ghazzälï, Maimonides, and Ibn Paquda on Repentance: A Comparative Model

M. S. Stern

This paper shows the striking affinity between the spokesmen of both Judaism and Islam, within the medieval "Arabic" milieu, in their understanding of the nature of both man and the world. This correspondence is exemplified by the teachings of three major religious personalities, Maimonides (b. 1135) and Ibn Paquda (eleventh and twelfth centuries) from within the Jewish tradition, and al-Ghazzälï (d. 1111) from within the Islamic tradition, on repentance as a basic spiritual imperative.

The concept of repentance, as taught by these three figures, is systematically outlined. Their views on the nature of man, sin, and repentance are examined together with their perceptions of the process of motivation. The essay then attempts to measure the similarities, in form and substance, in these presentations and to evaluate the possibility of direct influence or borrowing from one tradition to the other. By this means the author is drawn to the conclusion that the parallels are the result of a common perception of the psychological processes inherent in man and a shared world view.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.