Skip Navigation


Journal of the American Academy of Religion Advance Access originally published online on July 19, 2008
Journal of the American Academy of Religion 2008 76(3):573-601; doi:10.1093/jaarel/lfn054
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
76/3/573    most recent
lfn054v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LaMothe, K. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press, on behalf of the American Academy of Religion. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

What Bodies Know About Religion and the Study of It

Kimerer L. LaMothe

Kimerer L. LaMothe, Vital Arts Media, Hebron Hollow Farm, 1317 County Route 31, Granville, NY 12832, USA

E-mail: klamothe{at}post.harvard.edu


   Abstract

To advance the project of attending to the bodily dimensions of religious life, scholars must develop ways of acknowledging the role that their own bodily being plays in the study of religious life. One follows the other. Yet, the cast of debates over theory and method in the field hinders such developments. The tendency to think of religious studies as either scientific or interpretive—and the accompanying pressure to resolve the debate to one side or another—reinforces attachment to linguistic methods, models, and metaphors in defending one's position. Such attachment in turn discourages scholars from paying attention to their bodily engagement in the study of religion. This paper argues that scholars, by embracing a tension between "reason" and "experience" as generative of the field, can expand their range beyond text-dominant approaches. This paper demonstrates one direction for doing so, drawing on the case of modern dance to develop a scholarly approach that does justice to what bodies know about religion and the study of it.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.