Skip Navigation

Journal of the American Academy of Religion 2005 73(3):843-870; doi:10.1093/jaarel/lfi081
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sharma, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press, on behalf of the American Academy of Religion. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Dr. B. R. Ambedkar on the Aryan Invasion and the Emergence of the Caste System in India

Arvind Sharma

Birks Professor of Comparative Religion in the Faculty of Religious Studies at McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3A 2A7

The advent of the Aryans in India in the second millennium B.C.E. has long been considered a pivotal event in the history of the subcontinent, a view now under contestation academically (as well as politically by the Hindu Right). It has gone unnoticed in this context that one of the earliest coherent critiques of this regnant paradigm was offered by an opponent of the Hindu Right, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar (1892–1956). His views on the Aryan invasion and the emergence of the caste system in India—the subject of this article—far from being preciously esoteric, speak on at least three conceptual registers: (1) their biographical significance when compared to the views of B. G. Tilak (1856–1920), Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru (1889–1964), and, Ambedkar’s predecessor, Mahatma Jyotiba Phule (1827–1890); (2) their political significance in the role of Ambedkar, first as an opponent of the Brahmanical vision of the Hindu nation represented for him not only by the Mahasabha and the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) but the Gandhian Congress as well, then as the proponent of constitutionalism after the attainment of Indian independence in 1947, involving a simultaneous commitment to majority rule and minority protection, and later as the exponent of the exercise of Buddhist option out of Hinduism for the Dalits in 1956, and (3) finally, posthumously, as relevant to the current academic debate around ethnogenesis in South Asia.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.